MGLA does not surface opinions. It surfaces findings: structured records that bind an obligation to the artefact that violated it, ranked by a weighted risk score and routed to a named owner.
A finding has a fixed shape. It is not a paragraph of analysis and it is not a screenshot — it is a typed record that the framework can act on, route, version, and close.
The card on the right is a real specimen from a GDPR loop: an ambiguous legitimate-interest balancing test, surfaced across all four normative layers, with the evidence that produced it.
Surfaced by the loop and bound to a named owner with policy-driven routing.
Severity, confidence and ownership confirmed; if disputed, returned with evidence.
Remediation in progress. The framework re-evaluates on every relevant change.
Evidence confirms closure. The finding remains on the chain of evidence, versioned.
Drift in the layer that produced the finding re-opens it. The clock resumes.
A live regulatory analysis framework, developed and maintained by IT Law 2035.